QQJG vs VOO
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQJG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -11.31% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.29% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QQJG vs VOO Performance
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, QQJG is down 11.31% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, QQJG compounded at +10.04% per year against +21.79% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQJG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for QQJG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQJG charges 0.20% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQJG currently yields 0.69% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QQJG and VOO share 35 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQJG or VOO?
QQJG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQJG or VOO?
Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQJG annualized +0.79% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQJG or VOO?
QQJG has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQJG -36.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QQJG and VOO?
QQJG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQJG and VOO?
QQJG and VOO share 35 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQJG or VOO?
QQJG yields 0.69% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.