QQJG vs QQQ
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQJG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $7M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -11.31% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.29% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
QQJG vs QQQ Performance
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, QQJG is down 11.31% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, QQJG compounded at +10.04% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.2% for QQJG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for QQJG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQJG charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQJG currently yields 0.69% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
QQJG and QQQ share 6 holdings out of 185 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQJG or QQQ?
QQJG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQJG or QQQ?
Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQJG annualized +0.79% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQJG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.2% for QQJG. Worst drawdown: QQJG -36.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both QQJG and QQQ?
QQJG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQJG and QQQ?
QQJG and QQQ share 6 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 185 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQJG or QQQ?
QQJG yields 0.69% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQJG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.