QQQ vs STXF
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Strive 500 ETF
Which is better, QQQ or STXF?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
STXF has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. STXF is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | STXF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $483.5B | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.15% |
| Holdings | 107 | 512 |
| YTD Return | +17.95%Best | +12.55% |
| 1Y Return | +21.77%Best | +16.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63%Best | +21.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -19.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $25,518Best | $20,937 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Strive Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 15, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4 years).
QQQ vs STXF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs STXF Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Strive 500 ETF (STXF) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% while STXF returned +16.47%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 12.55% for STXF.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.63% per year against +21.55% for STXF. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +26.39% annualized vs +20.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 13.3% for STXF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -19.0% for STXF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while STXF charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $5 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.15% for STXF.
Holdings Overlap
96.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings STXF also owns. 53.9% of STXF's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside STXF. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
93 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 506 in STXF, against full books of 107 and 512.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 392 positions for STXF that do not appear in our book for QQQ (45.1% of the fund), and 3 for QQQ that do not appear in STXF (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in STXF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 7.81% | 0.63% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 6.92% | 0.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 5.69% | 0.07% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 3.81% | 0.86% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 2.97% | 0.39% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 1.62% | 2.81% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 2.61% | 0.55% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.13% | 2.37% | 0.76% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 1.90% | 0.88% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.45% | 1.16% | 2.29% |
96.4% of QQQ is already inside STXF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or STXF?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while STXF charges 0.05%. STXF is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or STXF?
Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% vs +16.47% for STXF, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +26.39% vs +20.29% for STXF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or STXF?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 13.3% for STXF. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs STXF -19.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and STXF?
QQQ and STXF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and STXF?
96.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings STXF also owns. 53.9% of STXF's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 93 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 506 in STXF.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or STXF?
QQQ yields 0.44% while STXF yields 1.15%, so STXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is STXF better than QQQ?
STXF has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. STXF is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.