QQQ vs USMC

Quick Verdict

USMC has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.

Lower Fees: USMCHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: QQQ

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQUSMCWinner
Expense Ratio0.18%0.12%
AUM$455.8B$3.6B
Dividend Yield0.41%0.75%
Holdings10828
YTD Return+18.20%+12.56%
1Y Return+27.63%+21.86%
3Y Return (annualized)+25.54%+21.07%
5Y Return (annualized)+15.12%+14.58%
Volatility (annualized)30.6%15.4%
Max Drawdown-83.0%-30.0%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Principal Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMar 10, 1999Oct 11, 2017

QQQ vs USMC Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is a ETF from Principal Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% while USMC returned +21.86%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.20% versus a gain of 12.56% for USMC.

Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.54% per year against +21.07% for USMC; over five years the annualized figures are +15.12% and +14.58% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, USMC has the edge at +14.45% annualized vs +13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.4% for USMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -30.0% for USMC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while USMC charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $12 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 0.75% for USMC.

Holdings Overlap

43.8%overlap

QQQ and USMC share 12 holdings out of 118 unique holdings combined, representing a 43.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in USMCDifference
NVDA7.88%7.46%0.42%
AAPL7.46%7.83%0.37%
MU4.67%6.25%1.58%
MSFTProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
COSTProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings QQQ shares with USMC
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or USMC?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while USMC charges 0.12%. USMC is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QQQ or USMC?

Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% vs +21.86% for USMC, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), QQQ annualized +13.11% vs +14.45% for USMC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QQQ or USMC?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.4% for USMC. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs USMC -30.0%.

Should I hold both QQQ and USMC?

QQQ and USMC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and USMC?

QQQ and USMC share 12 common holdings with a 43.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 118 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or USMC?

QQQ yields 0.41% while USMC yields 0.75%, so USMC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →