QQQ vs VUSG

QQQ vs VUSG

Which is better, QQQ or VUSG?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.4%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQVUSG
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.35%
AUM$483.5B$32M
Dividend Yield0.44%0.02%
Holdings10743
YTD Return+17.95%Best+8.14%
1Y Return+21.77%-
3Y Return (annualized)+25.63%-
5Y Return (annualized)+15.24%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%Best64.4%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 10, 1999Nov 14, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs VUSG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs VUSG Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Wellington US Growth Active ETF (VUSG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 8.14% for VUSG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while VUSG charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $35 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.02% for VUSG.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in VUSG51.4%
VUSG already in QQQ72.3%

51.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings VUSG also owns. 72.3% of VUSG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

Most of VUSG is already inside QQQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 42 in VUSG, against full books of 107 and 43.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 19 positions for VUSG that do not appear in our book for QQQ (22.8% of the fund), and 79 for QQQ that do not appear in VUSG (47.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in VUSGDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.44%17.30%8.86%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.36%12.07%8.71%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%7.00%1.24%
AAPLApple, Inc7.27%4.36%2.91%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.43%4.92%0.49%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%5.48%2.32%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.67%2.26%2.41%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.45%3.19%0.26%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.78%2.30%0.48%
TSLATesla Inc2.56%1.56%1.00%

72.3% of VUSG is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQVUSG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or VUSG?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VUSG charges 0.35%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and VUSG?

72.3% of VUSG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 72.3% of VUSG's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 42 in VUSG.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or VUSG?

QQQ yields 0.44% while VUSG yields 0.02%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VUSG better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.