QQQ vs WDAI

QQQ vs WDAI

Which is better, QQQ or WDAI?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. WDAI is less concentrated, with 7.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: WDAI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQWDAI
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.60%
AUM$483.5B$1M
Dividend Yield0.44%0.17%
Holdings107305
YTD Return+15.94%Best+12.49%
1Y Return+20.44%-
3Y Return (annualized)+24.86%-
5Y Return (annualized)+14.26%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%7.7%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Pacer ETFs
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 10, 1999May 7, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs WDAI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs WDAI Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Pacer S&P World 3AI Top 300 ETF (WDAI) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.94% versus a gain of 12.49% for WDAI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WDAI charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $60 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.17% for WDAI.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in WDAI70.5%
WDAI already in QQQ19.9%

70.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings WDAI also owns. 19.9% of WDAI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

Most of QQQ is already inside WDAI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

42 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 295 in WDAI, against full books of 107 and 305.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 56 positions for WDAI that do not appear in our book for QQQ (22.6% of the fund), and 56 for QQQ that do not appear in WDAI (28.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in WDAIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.44%0.57%7.87%
AAPLApple, Inc7.27%0.57%6.70%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%0.57%5.19%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.43%0.58%3.85%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.67%0.31%4.36%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.45%0.53%2.92%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.36%0.35%3.01%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%0.51%2.65%
GOOGAlphabet Inc3.13%0.26%2.87%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.78%0.54%2.24%

70.5% of QQQ is already inside WDAI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQWDAI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or WDAI?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WDAI charges 0.60%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WDAI?

70.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings WDAI also owns. 19.9% of WDAI's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 42 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 295 in WDAI.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WDAI?

QQQ yields 0.44% while WDAI yields 0.17%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WDAI better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. WDAI is less concentrated, with 7.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.