QQQ vs WLTG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
Which is better, QQQ or WLTG?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. WLTG is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.74% |
| AUM | $498.6B | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 4.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 87 |
| YTD Return | +22.67%Best | +9.01% |
| 1Y Return | +24.33%Best | +13.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.05%Best | +24.53% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.00% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.0% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | -25.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $19,364Best | $15,856 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.2% | 44.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WealthTrust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 6, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2021 to Oct 2, 2026 (4.8 years).
QQQ vs WLTG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs WLTG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) is an ETF from WealthTrust Asset Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.33% while WLTG returned +13.63%. Year to date, QQQ is up 22.67% versus a gain of 9.01% for WLTG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +29.05% per year against +24.53% for WLTG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 13.6% for WLTG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -25.1% for WLTG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WLTG charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $74 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 4.00% for WLTG.
Holdings Overlap
42.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 23.2% of WLTG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 43 in WLTG, against full books of 321 and 87.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 32 positions for WLTG that do not appear in our book for QQQ (72.8% of the fund), and 86 for QQQ that do not appear in WLTG (55.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in WLTG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.45% | 3.87% | 4.58% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.80% | 1.62% | 6.18% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.88% | 1.91% | 3.97% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.41% | 2.92% | 1.49% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.85% | 2.46% | 2.39% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.07% | 3.36% | 0.29% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.15% | 2.30% | 0.85% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.74% | 1.90% | 0.84% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 1.44% | 1.26% | 0.18% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.87% | 1.61% | 0.74% |
42.7% of QQQ is already inside WLTG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WLTG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WLTG charges 0.74%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or WLTG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.33% vs +13.63% for WLTG, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WLTG?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 13.6% for WLTG. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs WLTG -25.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WLTG?
QQQ and WLTG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WLTG?
42.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 23.2% of WLTG's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 43 in WLTG.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WLTG?
QQQ yields 0.42% while WLTG yields 4.00%, so WLTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WLTG better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. WLTG is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.