QQQ vs XAIW
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, QQQ or XAIW?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XAIW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +15.94%Best | -5.79% |
| 1Y Return | +20.44% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.86% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.26% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 64.2% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs XAIW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs XAIW Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (XAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.94% versus a loss of 5.79% for XAIW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $59 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for XAIW.
Holdings Overlap
24.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings XAIW also owns. 48.9% of XAIW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 25 in XAIW, against full books of 107 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 11 positions for XAIW that do not appear in our book for QQQ (33.6% of the fund), and 88 for QQQ that do not appear in XAIW (73.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in XAIW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 0.91% | 20.69% | 19.78% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 8.74% | 0.30% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 2.70% | 3.06% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.56% | 4.48% | 1.92% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.23% | 2.68% | 0.45% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 1.69% | 3.16% | 1.47% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.81% | 3.87% | 3.06% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.86% | 2.53% | 0.67% |
48.9% of XAIW is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XAIW?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XAIW charges 0.59%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and XAIW?
48.9% of XAIW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 48.9% of XAIW's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 25 in XAIW.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XAIW?
QQQ yields 0.44% while XAIW yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XAIW better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.