VYM vs XAIW

VYM vs XAIW

Which is better, VYM or XAIW?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVYMXAIW
Expense Ratio0.04%Best0.59%
AUM$81.6B$2M
Dividend Yield2.22%0.00%
Holdings61325
YTD Return+13.08%Best-5.79%
1Y Return+17.46%-
3Y Return (annualized)+17.73%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.22%-
Top 10 Weight26.1%Best64.2%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Harbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Growth
InceptionNov 10, 2006Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

VYM vs XAIW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

VYM vs XAIW Performance

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (XAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, VYM is up 13.08% versus a loss of 5.79% for XAIW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VYM charges 0.04% per year while XAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $59 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.22% against 0.00% for XAIW.

Holdings Overlap

VYM already in XAIW4.4%
XAIW already in VYM26.9%

4.4% of VYM's money is in holdings XAIW also owns. 26.9% of XAIW's money is in holdings VYM also owns.

XAIW and VYM share little of their money.

8 positions in common, counted across the 557 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 25 in XAIW, against full books of 613 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 11 positions for XAIW that do not appear in our book for VYM (55.6% of the fund), and 520 for VYM that do not appear in XAIW (92.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VYMWeight in XAIWDifference
ORCLOracle Corp - Common0.90%5.17%4.27%
DELLDell Technologies Inc0.50%4.65%4.15%
ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.0.73%3.87%3.14%
APOAthene (Ath) / Apollo Global Management (Apo)0.21%3.60%3.39%
CARRCarrier Global Corp Common Stock Usd.010.20%3.32%3.12%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.1.50%1.97%0.47%
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co0.26%2.11%1.85%
GENGen Digital Inc0.06%2.21%2.15%

26.9% of XAIW is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VYMXAIW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VYM or XAIW?

VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XAIW charges 0.59%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between VYM and XAIW?

26.9% of XAIW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 26.9% of XAIW's is in holdings VYM also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 557 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 25 in XAIW.

Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XAIW?

VYM yields 2.22% while XAIW yields 0.00%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XAIW better than VYM?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.