QQQ vs XIGV

QQQ vs XIGV

Which is better, QQQ or XIGV?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.2%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQXIGV
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.65%
AUM$437.3B$212,528.13
Dividend Yield0.43%0.00%
Holdings208158
YTD Return+12.98%Best-8.28%
1Y Return+11.59%-
3Y Return (annualized)+23.05%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.74%-
Top 10 Weight46.9%Best50.2%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Defiance ETFs, LLC
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 10, 1999Jun 24, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs XIGV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs XIGV Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Defiance US 100 Tech Ex Software ETF (XIGV) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Year to date, QQQ is up 12.98% versus a loss of 8.28% for XIGV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XIGV charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $65 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.43% against 0.00% for XIGV.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in XIGV73.6%
XIGV already in QQQ98.8%

73.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings XIGV also owns. 98.8% of XIGV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

Most of XIGV is already inside QQQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

69 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 77 in XIGV, against full books of 208 and 158.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 8 positions for XIGV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (1.2% of the fund), and 27 for QQQ that do not appear in XIGV (24.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in XIGVDifference
AAPLApple Inc7.68%5.51%2.17%
NVDANvidia Corp8.05%5.06%2.99%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.90%5.72%1.82%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.37%5.93%2.56%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.47%4.74%0.27%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.23%4.97%0.74%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.15%4.59%1.44%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies2.71%4.85%2.14%
TSLATesla Inc2.93%4.46%1.53%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.52%4.38%1.86%

98.8% of XIGV is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQXIGV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or XIGV?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XIGV charges 0.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and XIGV?

98.8% of XIGV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 98.8% of XIGV's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 77 in XIGV.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XIGV?

QQQ yields 0.43% while XIGV yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XIGV better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.