QQQ vs XVV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QQQ or XVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
XVV has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. XVV is less concentrated, with 42.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.08%Best |
| AUM | $483.5B | $677M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.90% |
| Holdings | 107 | 448 |
| YTD Return | +17.21%Best | +10.78% |
| 1Y Return | +22.10%Best | +15.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.27%Best | +21.09% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.60%Best | +12.50% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | -27.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,766Best | $18,020 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 42.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 22, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2020 to Sep 17, 2026 (6 years).
QQQ vs XVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs XVV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% while XVV returned +15.00%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a gain of 10.78% for XVV.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.27% per year against +21.09% for XVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.60% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.72% annualized vs +16.53%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 16.0% for XVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -27.2% for XVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XVV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $8 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.90% for XVV.
Holdings Overlap
85.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings XVV also owns. 57.0% of XVV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside XVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
76 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 435 in XVV, against full books of 107 and 448.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 355 positions for XVV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (42.3% of the fund), and 20 for QQQ that do not appear in XVV (12.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in XVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 9.02% | 0.58% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 7.85% | 0.58% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 6.36% | 0.60% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 4.29% | 0.38% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 3.36% | 0.00% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 1.82% | 2.61% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 2.96% | 0.20% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.13% | 2.67% | 0.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 2.12% | 0.66% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.56% | 1.75% | 0.81% |
85.3% of QQQ is already inside XVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XVV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XVV charges 0.08%. XVV is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or XVV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% vs +15.00% for XVV, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QQQ annualized +18.72% vs +16.53% for XVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or XVV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 16.0% for XVV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs XVV -27.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and XVV?
QQQ and XVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and XVV?
85.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings XVV also owns. 57.0% of XVV's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 76 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 435 in XVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XVV?
QQQ yields 0.44% while XVV yields 0.90%, so XVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XVV better than QQQ?
XVV has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. XVV is less concentrated, with 42.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.