QQQG vs VTI
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $45M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.99% | +12.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.74% | +20.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
QQQG vs VTI Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQG returned +32.74% while VTI returned +20.47%. Year to date, QQQG is up 24.99% versus a gain of 12.79% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.05% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QQQG and VTI share 47 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or VTI?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQG or VTI?
Over the past year QQQG returned +32.74% vs +20.47% for VTI, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +21.08% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQG or VTI?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QQQG and VTI?
QQQG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and VTI?
QQQG and VTI share 47 common holdings with a 16.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or VTI?
QQQG yields 0.05% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.