QQQG vs VTI
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QQQG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $43M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +24.73%Best | +12.08% |
| 1Y Return | +29.41%Best | +16.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,747Best | $14,031 |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2024 to Sep 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
QQQG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QQQG vs VTI Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQG returned +29.41% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, QQQG is up 24.73% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 12.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.05% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.1% of QQQG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.2% of VTI's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
Most of QQQG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 51 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 51 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,102 positions QQQG does not, 67.3% of the fund.
Largest: AMZN 3.65%, GOOGL 2.90%, GOOG 2.31%, META 1.70%, LLY 1.35%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.55% | 6.29% | 4.74% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.12% | 6.40% | 5.28% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 6.33% | 0.25% | 6.08% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.86% | 1.29% | 3.57% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.22% | 4.79% | 3.57% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.43% | 1.08% | 3.35% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 5.08% | 0.26% | 4.82% |
| STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc | 4.97% | 0.27% | 4.70% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 4.73% | 0.23% | 4.50% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 4.83% | 0.12% | 4.71% |
98.1% of QQQG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or VTI?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQG or VTI?
Over the past year QQQG returned +29.41% vs +16.31% for VTI, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +20.32% vs +17.50% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQG or VTI?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 12.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both QQQG and VTI?
QQQG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and VTI?
98.1% of QQQG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.2% of VTI's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or VTI?
QQQG yields 0.05% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QQQG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.