QQQG vs VOO
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQQG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $45M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +27.97% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.74% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QQQG vs VOO Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQG returned +36.74% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QQQG is up 27.97% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.05% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QQQG and VOO share 48 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or VOO?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQG or VOO?
Over the past year QQQG returned +36.74% vs +21.87% for VOO, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +22.61% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQG or VOO?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QQQG and VOO?
QQQG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and VOO?
QQQG and VOO share 48 common holdings with a 18.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or VOO?
QQQG yields 0.05% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.