QQQG vs VOO
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QQQG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $49M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 104 | 519 |
| YTD Return | +14.64%Best | +12.11% |
| 1Y Return | +14.43%Best | +12.50% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.93% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.2% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $13,424 | $13,919Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.4% | 39.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2024 to Nov 11, 2026 (2.2 years).
QQQG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
QQQG vs VOO Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQG returned +14.43% while VOO returned +12.50%. Year to date, QQQG is up 14.64% versus a gain of 12.11% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 12.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.07% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
94.7% of QQQG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 36.8% of VOO's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
Most of QQQG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 506 in VOO, against full books of 104 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 453 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QQQG (63.2% of the fund), and 2 for QQQG that do not appear in VOO (5.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.14% | 8.39% | 7.25% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 1.76% | 7.38% | 5.62% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.33% | 5.78% | 4.45% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.24% | 1.52% | 3.72% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.69% | 1.83% | 2.86% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 5.53% | 0.39% | 5.14% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 5.37% | 0.35% | 5.02% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A | 5.32% | 0.14% | 5.18% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 5.00% | 0.17% | 4.83% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 4.01% | 0.49% | 3.52% |
94.7% of QQQG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or VOO?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQG or VOO?
Over the past year QQQG returned +14.43% vs +12.50% for VOO, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +14.32% vs +16.22% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQG or VOO?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 12.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both QQQG and VOO?
QQQG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and VOO?
94.7% of QQQG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 36.8% of VOO's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 506 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or VOO?
QQQG yields 0.07% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QQQG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.