QQQM vs XXQQ

QQQM vs XXQQ

Which is better, QQQM or XXQQ?

QQQM costs less.

QQQM has a lower expense ratio. QQQM is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.4%.

Lower Fees: QQQMLess Concentrated: QQQM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQMXXQQ
Expense Ratio0.15%Best0.30%
AUM$100.7B$864,529.7
Dividend Yield0.45%0.00%
Holdings21498
YTD Return+12.66%Best-8.83%
1Y Return+11.36%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.97%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.51%-
Top 10 Weight46.9%Best48.4%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Subversive Capital
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionOct 13, 2020Oct 8, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQM vs XXQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare QQQM against instead:QQQM vs SPYQQQM vs QQQQQQM vs VOOQQQM vs VTIXXQQ against:XXQQ vs VXUS

QQQM vs XXQQ Performance

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Subversive Growth 100 Redacted ETF (XXQQ) is an ETF from Subversive Capital. Year to date, QQQM is up 12.66% versus a loss of 8.83% for XXQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQM charges 0.15% per year while XXQQ charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $30 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQM currently yields 0.45% against 0.00% for XXQQ.

Holdings Overlap

QQQM already in XXQQ92.6%
XXQQ already in QQQM98.4%

92.6% of QQQM's money is in holdings XXQQ also owns. 98.4% of XXQQ's money is in holdings QQQM also owns.

Most of XXQQ is already inside QQQM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

97 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQM and 98 in XXQQ, against full books of 214 and 98.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1 positions for XXQQ that do not appear in our book for QQQM (0.8% of the fund), and 4 for QQQM that do not appear in XXQQ (6.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQMWeight in XXQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.06%8.40%0.34%
AAPLApple Inc7.68%8.45%0.77%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.16%6.65%0.49%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.47%4.77%0.30%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.23%4.35%0.12%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.90%4.33%0.43%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.37%3.19%0.18%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.15%2.78%0.37%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.93%2.64%0.29%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.52%2.79%0.27%

98.4% of XXQQ is already inside QQQM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQMXXQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQM or XXQQ?

QQQM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while XXQQ charges 0.30%. QQQM is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQM and XXQQ?

98.4% of XXQQ's money is in holdings QQQM also owns. 98.4% of XXQQ's is in holdings QQQM also owns. They hold 97 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQM and 98 in XXQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQM or XXQQ?

QQQM yields 0.45% while XXQQ yields 0.00%, so QQQM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XXQQ better than QQQM?

QQQM has a lower expense ratio. QQQM is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.