QRMI vs VXUS
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QRMI | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $15M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 12.19% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.49% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.99% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.78% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.73% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QRMI vs VXUS Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QRMI returned +7.99% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, QRMI is up 2.49% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, QRMI compounded at +6.78% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.73% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs +1.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.7% for QRMI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for QRMI and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QRMI charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QRMI currently yields 12.19% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QRMI and VXUS share 5 holdings out of 7957 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QRMI or VXUS?
QRMI has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QRMI or VXUS?
Over the past year QRMI returned +7.99% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QRMI annualized +1.73% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QRMI or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.7% for QRMI. Worst drawdown: QRMI -20.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QRMI and VXUS?
QRMI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QRMI and VXUS?
QRMI and VXUS share 5 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7957 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QRMI or VXUS?
QRMI yields 12.19% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so QRMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.