QRMI vs VTI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QRMI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $15M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 12.58% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.18% | +12.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.16% | +20.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.10% | +21.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.46% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
QRMI vs VTI Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QRMI returned +7.16% while VTI returned +20.47%. Year to date, QRMI is up 1.18% versus a gain of 12.79% for VTI.
Over three years, QRMI compounded at +7.10% per year against +21.53% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.46% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +1.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.7% for QRMI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for QRMI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QRMI charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QRMI currently yields 12.58% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QRMI and VTI share 90 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 47.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QRMI or VTI?
QRMI has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QRMI or VTI?
Over the past year QRMI returned +7.16% vs +20.47% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QRMI annualized +1.46% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QRMI or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.7% for QRMI. Worst drawdown: QRMI -20.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QRMI and VTI?
QRMI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QRMI and VTI?
QRMI and VTI share 90 common holdings with a 47.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QRMI or VTI?
QRMI yields 12.58% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QRMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.