RACK vs VTI
VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RACK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $54M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -9.97% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | -9.97% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 230991813.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
RACK vs VTI Performance
VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RACK returned -9.97% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, RACK is down 9.97% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 230991813.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for RACK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RACK charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RACK currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RACK and VTI share 42 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RACK or VTI?
RACK has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RACK or VTI?
Over the past year RACK returned -9.97% vs +20.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RACK annualized +19.78% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RACK or VTI?
RACK has been the more volatile fund at 230991813.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RACK -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RACK and VTI?
RACK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RACK and VTI?
RACK and VTI share 42 common holdings with a 15.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RACK or VTI?
RACK yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.