RACK vs VTI

RACK vs VTI

Which is better, RACK or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RACK led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRACKVTI
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%Best
AUM$60M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings513,543
YTD Return-13.55%+11.53%Best
1Y Return-13.55%+15.74%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.67%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.59%
Volatility (annualized)229121403.5%15.0%Best
Max Drawdown--35.0%
$10,000 over 12.6 years$92,399Best$41,983
Top 10 Weight44.6%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyVanEckVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 1, 2026May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 12.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 18, 2014 to Sep 15, 2026 (12.6 years).

RACK vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.6 years both funds cover.

RACK vs VTI Performance

VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RACK returned -13.55% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, RACK is down 13.55% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 229121403.5% compared with 15.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RACK charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RACK currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

RACK already in VTI90.8%
VTI already in RACK15.8%

90.8% of RACK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 15.8% of VTI's money is in holdings RACK also owns.

Most of RACK is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

45 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in RACK and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 51 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,106 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RACK (81.7% of the fund), and 1 for RACK that do not appear in VTI (1.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RACKWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp4.96%6.40%1.44%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.55%2.56%1.99%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.79%1.29%3.50%
CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com5.30%0.12%5.18%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A5.01%0.27%4.74%
ETNEaton Corp Plc4.31%0.22%4.09%
PEGPublic Svc Ent Group4.06%0.05%4.01%
ANETArista Networks Inc.3.58%0.27%3.31%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.65%1.08%1.57%
SNDKSandisk Corp/De3.45%0.25%3.20%

90.8% of RACK is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RACKVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RACK or VTI?

RACK has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, RACK or VTI?

Over the past year RACK returned -13.55% vs +15.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RACK annualized +19.30% vs +12.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, RACK or VTI?

RACK has been the more volatile fund at 229121403.5% annualized versus 15.0% for VTI.

Should I hold both RACK and VTI?

RACK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between RACK and VTI?

90.8% of RACK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 15.8% of VTI's is in holdings RACK also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in RACK and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, RACK or VTI?

RACK yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than RACK?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. RACK led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.