REGS vs XOVR
Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF vs ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Which is better, REGS or XOVR?
REGS has been ahead.
REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REGS | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 1.81% |
| AUM | $77M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 124 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +16.92%Best | +11.07% |
| 1Y Return | - | +2.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.50% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | ERShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2026 | Nov 7, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
REGS vs XOVR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
REGS vs XOVR Performance
Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is an ETF from ERShares. Year to date, REGS is up 16.92% versus a gain of 11.07% for XOVR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REGS charges 0.35% per year while XOVR charges 1.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $181 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REGS currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XOVR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 20.8% of REGS's money is in holdings XOVR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for XOVR, our book for it covers 80.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
REGS and XOVR share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 73 days apart, REGS as of Sep 11, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
5 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in REGS and 30 in XOVR, against full books of 124 and 33.
20.8% of REGS is already inside XOVR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REGS or XOVR?
REGS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while XOVR charges 1.81%. REGS is the cheaper option, by $146 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between REGS and XOVR?
At least 20.8% of REGS's money is in holdings XOVR also owns. Our book for XOVR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in REGS and 30 in XOVR.
Which pays a higher dividend, REGS or XOVR?
REGS yields 0.00% while XOVR yields 0.00%, so XOVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XOVR better than REGS?
REGS has a lower expense ratio. REGS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.