REGS vs VTI

REGS vs VTI

Which is better, REGS or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricREGSVTI
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%Best
AUM-$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings623,543
YTD Return+15.98%Best+14.05%
1Y Return-+16.93%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.65%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.46%
Top 10 Weight51.9%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyColumbia Threadneedle InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 16, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

REGS vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

REGS vs VTI Performance

Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, REGS is up 15.98% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

REGS charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REGS currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

REGS already in VTI98.8%
VTI already in REGS40.8%

98.8% of REGS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 40.8% of VTI's money is in holdings REGS also owns.

Most of REGS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

59 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in REGS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 62 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,093 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for REGS (56.8% of the fund), and 1 for REGS that do not appear in VTI (0.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in REGSWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp12.12%6.40%5.72%
AAPLApple, Inc8.77%6.29%2.48%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.39%4.79%0.60%
AVGOBroadcom Inc6.33%2.56%3.77%
GOOGAlphabet Inc5.22%2.31%2.91%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.24%3.65%1.41%
METAMeta Platforms Inc4.07%1.70%2.37%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.42%1.35%2.07%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A1.83%2.90%1.07%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.46%1.08%1.38%

98.8% of REGS is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

REGSVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, REGS or VTI?

REGS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between REGS and VTI?

98.8% of REGS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 40.8% of VTI's is in holdings REGS also owns. They hold 59 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in REGS and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, REGS or VTI?

REGS yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than REGS?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.