RSPE vs VTI
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RSPE or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPE led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. RSPE is less concentrated, with 8.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $71M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 376 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +13.98% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.43%Best | +16.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.01% | +22.93%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.24% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,857 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.1%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2021 to Oct 5, 2026 (4.9 years).
RSPE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
RSPE vs VTI Performance
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPE returned +17.43% while VTI returned +16.22%. Year to date, RSPE is up 13.98% versus a gain of 14.14% for VTI.
Over three years, RSPE compounded at +18.01% per year against +22.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.24% and +12.76% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for RSPE and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPE charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPE currently yields 1.43% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.3% of RSPE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 39.8% of VTI's money is in holdings RSPE also owns.
Most of RSPE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, RSPE as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
183 positions in common, counted across the 185 positions we hold weights for in RSPE and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 376 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 970 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RSPE (57.7% of the fund), and 2 for RSPE that do not appear in VTI (0.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSPE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.57% | 6.40% | 5.83% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.65% | 4.79% | 4.14% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 0.28% | 2.90% | 2.62% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.22% | 2.31% | 2.09% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.57% | 1.29% | 0.72% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.60% | 1.08% | 0.48% |
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 1.64% | 0.03% | 1.61% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.60% | 0.83% | 0.23% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.61% | 0.63% | 0.02% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.60% | 0.61% | 0.01% |
99.3% of RSPE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPE or VTI?
RSPE has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSPE or VTI?
Over the past year RSPE returned +17.43% vs +16.22% for VTI, so RSPE leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSPE or VTI?
RSPE has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSPE -22.9% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both RSPE and VTI?
RSPE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPE and VTI?
99.3% of RSPE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 39.8% of VTI's is in holdings RSPE also owns. They hold 183 positions in common, counted across the 185 positions we hold weights for in RSPE and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPE or VTI?
RSPE yields 1.43% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RSPE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RSPE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPE led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. RSPE is less concentrated, with 8.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.