RSSL vs SPY
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
RSSL has a lower expense ratio. RSSL delivered stronger 1-year returns. RSSL offers more diversification with 1387 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSSL | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 1,918 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +22.26% | +13.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.84% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.44% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | Jan 22, 1993 |
RSSL vs SPY Performance
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year RSSL returned +34.84% while SPY returned +21.53%. Year to date, RSSL is up 22.26% versus a gain of 13.68% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for RSSL and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSSL charges 0.08% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $9 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSSL currently yields 1.23% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
RSSL and SPY share 0 holdings out of 1890 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSSL or SPY?
RSSL has an expense ratio of 0.08% while SPY charges 0.09%. RSSL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSSL or SPY?
Over the past year RSSL returned +34.84% vs +21.53% for SPY, so RSSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSSL annualized +20.61% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSSL or SPY?
RSSL has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: RSSL -28.2% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both RSSL and SPY?
RSSL and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSSL and SPY?
RSSL and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1890 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSSL or SPY?
RSSL yields 1.23% while SPY yields 1.01%, so RSSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.