RSSL vs VTI
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RSSL or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSSL led over 1Y, VTI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSSL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.4B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1,981 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +13.03%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +16.23%Best | +15.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $13,880 | $14,616Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Oct 1, 2026 (2.3 years).
RSSL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
RSSL vs VTI Performance
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSSL returned +16.23% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, RSSL is up 13.03% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 12.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for RSSL and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSSL charges 0.08% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSSL currently yields 1.23% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.4% of VTI's money is in holdings RSSL also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RSSL, our book for it covers 90.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and RSSL share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, RSSL as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1,427 positions in common, counted across the 1,560 positions we hold weights for in RSSL and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,981 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSSL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOG.AMoog Inccommon Stock | 0.34% | 0.02% | 0.32% |
| UMBFUmb Financial Corp. | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.33% |
| CYTKCytokinetics Inc | 0.32% | 0.01% | 0.31% |
| VSATViasat Inc | 0.31% | 0.01% | 0.30% |
| GKOSGlaukos Corp. | 0.31% | 0.01% | 0.30% |
| FROGJfrog Ltd | 0.31% | 0.01% | 0.30% |
| BTSGBrightspring Health | 0.31% | 0.01% | 0.30% |
| FCFSFirstcash Inc | 0.31% | 0.01% | 0.30% |
| IDCCInterdigital Inc | 0.30% | 0.01% | 0.29% |
| PTGXProtagonist Therapeutics Inc | 0.30% | 0.01% | 0.29% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RSSL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSSL or VTI?
RSSL has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSSL or VTI?
Over the past year RSSL returned +16.23% vs +15.23% for VTI, so RSSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSSL annualized +15.32% vs +17.94% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSSL or VTI?
RSSL has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 12.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSSL -28.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both RSSL and VTI?
RSSL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSSL and VTI?
At least 2.4% of VTI's money is in holdings RSSL also owns. Our book for RSSL is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1,427 positions in common, counted across the 1,560 positions we hold weights for in RSSL and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSSL or VTI?
RSSL yields 1.23% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RSSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RSSL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSSL led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.