RSSL vs VTI
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSSL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSSL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,918 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +22.58% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.72% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
RSSL vs VTI Performance
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSSL returned +32.72% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, RSSL is up 22.58% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for RSSL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSSL charges 0.08% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSSL currently yields 1.23% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RSSL and VTI share 999 holdings out of 3171 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSSL or VTI?
RSSL has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSSL or VTI?
Over the past year RSSL returned +32.72% vs +22.39% for VTI, so RSSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSSL annualized +20.72% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSSL or VTI?
RSSL has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSSL -28.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSSL and VTI?
RSSL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSSL and VTI?
RSSL and VTI share 999 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3171 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSSL or VTI?
RSSL yields 1.23% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RSSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.