RSSL vs VOO
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RSSL delivered stronger 1-year returns. RSSL offers more diversification with 1387 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSSL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,918 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +21.50% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.80% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RSSL vs VOO Performance
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSSL returned +37.80% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, RSSL is up 21.50% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for RSSL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSSL charges 0.08% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSSL currently yields 1.23% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RSSL and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1892 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSSL or VOO?
RSSL has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSSL or VOO?
Over the past year RSSL returned +37.80% vs +22.62% for VOO, so RSSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSSL annualized +20.29% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSSL or VOO?
RSSL has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RSSL -28.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RSSL and VOO?
RSSL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSSL and VOO?
RSSL and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1892 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSSL or VOO?
RSSL yields 1.23% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RSSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.