RVNU vs VOO
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Active ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVNU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $144M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.60% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 292 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.00% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.85% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.62% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.62% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2013 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RVNU vs VOO Performance
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Active ETF (RVNU) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVNU returned +7.85% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, RVNU is up 2.00% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, RVNU compounded at +3.62% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.62% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.0% for RVNU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.5% for RVNU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVNU charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVNU currently yields 3.60% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RVNU and VOO share 0 holdings out of 684 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVNU or VOO?
RVNU has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RVNU or VOO?
Over the past year RVNU returned +7.85% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RVNU annualized +1.09% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RVNU or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.0% for RVNU. Worst drawdown: RVNU -23.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RVNU and VOO?
RVNU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RVNU and VOO?
RVNU and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 684 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVNU or VOO?
RVNU yields 3.60% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RVNU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.