RWLC vs SCHD
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, RWLC or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWLC | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $100M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 12.58% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 115 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +17.63% | +21.73%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +26.35% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RWLC vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RWLC vs SCHD Performance
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, RWLC is up 17.63% versus a gain of 21.73% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWLC charges 0.32% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $6 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWLC currently yields 12.58% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
3.1% of RWLC's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 15.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings RWLC also owns.
SCHD and RWLC share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 115 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for RWLC (84.6% of the fund), and 94 for RWLC that do not appear in SCHD (95.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RWLC and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWLC or SCHD?
RWLC has an expense ratio of 0.32% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RWLC and SCHD?
15.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 15.3% of SCHD's is in holdings RWLC also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWLC or SCHD?
RWLC yields 12.58% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than RWLC?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.