RWLC vs VXUS
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, RWLC or VXUS?
VXUS has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWLC | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $100M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 12.58% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 115 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +17.06%Best | +12.88% |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.14% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.87% |
| Fund Family | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RWLC vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RWLC vs VXUS Performance
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RWLC is up 17.06% versus a gain of 12.88% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWLC charges 0.32% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $5 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWLC currently yields 12.58% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.5% of RWLC's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 115 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RWLC | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRKroger Co. | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.53% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RWLC and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWLC or VXUS?
RWLC has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWLC or VXUS?
RWLC yields 12.58% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than RWLC?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.