RWLC vs SPY

RWLC vs SPY

Which is better, RWLC or SPY?

RWLC has been ahead.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns (1Y): RWLCLess Concentrated: RWLC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRWLCSPY
Expense Ratio0.32%0.09%Best
AUM$100M$804.7B
Dividend Yield12.58%0.98%
Holdings115505
YTD Return+15.08%Best+10.96%
1Y Return-+15.52%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.73%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.53%
Top 10 Weight36.9%Best37.8%
Fund FamilyThe Advisors Inner Circle FundState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 15, 2021Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

RWLC vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RWLC vs SPY Performance

Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, RWLC is up 15.08% versus a gain of 10.96% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RWLC charges 0.32% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $9 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWLC currently yields 12.58% against 0.98% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

RWLC already in SPY98.8%
SPY already in RWLC55.8%

98.8% of RWLC's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 55.8% of SPY's money is in holdings RWLC also owns.

Most of RWLC is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

99 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 504 in SPY, against full books of 115 and 505.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 398 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for RWLC (43.6% of the fund), and 0 for RWLC that do not appear in SPY (0.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RWLCWeight in SPYDifference
AAPLApple, Inc8.82%7.26%1.56%
NVDANvidia Corp6.68%8.01%1.33%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.89%5.66%2.77%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.52%2.99%0.53%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.27%3.79%1.52%
GOOGAlphabet Inc3.13%2.39%0.74%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.89%1.60%1.29%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.21%2.66%1.45%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.00%1.40%0.60%
MAMastercard Inc2.65%0.71%1.94%

98.8% of RWLC is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RWLCSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RWLC or SPY?

RWLC has an expense ratio of 0.32% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between RWLC and SPY?

98.8% of RWLC's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 55.8% of SPY's is in holdings RWLC also owns. They hold 99 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, RWLC or SPY?

RWLC yields 12.58% while SPY yields 0.98%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than RWLC?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.