IVV vs RWLC

IVV vs RWLC

Which is better, IVV or RWLC?

RWLC has been ahead.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): RWLCLess Concentrated: RWLC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVRWLC
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.32%
AUM$876.4B$100M
Dividend Yield1.06%12.58%
Holdings508115
YTD Return+12.27%+17.56%Best
1Y Return+17.04%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.24%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.08%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%36.9%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)The Advisors Inner Circle Fund
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 15, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs RWLC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs RWLC Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 17.56% for RWLC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while RWLC charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $32 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 12.58% for RWLC.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in RWLC55.5%
RWLC already in IVV98.2%

55.5% of IVV's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 98.2% of RWLC's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

Most of RWLC is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

98 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in RWLC, against full books of 508 and 115.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1 positions for RWLC that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.6% of the fund), and 384 for IVV that do not appear in RWLC (43.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in RWLCDifference
AAPLApple, Inc7.02%8.82%1.80%
NVDANvidia Corp8.07%6.68%1.39%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.69%2.89%2.80%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.00%3.52%0.52%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.84%2.27%1.57%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.39%3.13%0.74%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.63%2.89%1.26%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.65%1.21%1.44%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.38%2.00%0.62%
MAMastercard Inc0.72%2.65%1.93%

98.2% of RWLC is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVRWLC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or RWLC?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RWLC charges 0.32%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RWLC?

98.2% of RWLC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 98.2% of RWLC's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 98 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in RWLC.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RWLC?

IVV yields 1.06% while RWLC yields 12.58%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is RWLC better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.