RXI vs VTI
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RXI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $274M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 151 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.29% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.25% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.45% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
RXI vs VTI Performance
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RXI returned +3.25% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, RXI is down 2.29% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, RXI compounded at +11.45% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.45% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RXI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for RXI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RXI charges 0.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RXI currently yields 1.45% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RXI and VTI share 43 holdings out of 2876 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RXI or VTI?
RXI has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RXI or VTI?
Over the past year RXI returned +3.25% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RXI annualized +7.37% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RXI or VTI?
RXI has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RXI -62.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RXI and VTI?
RXI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RXI and VTI?
RXI and VTI share 43 common holdings with a 8.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2876 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RXI or VTI?
RXI yields 1.45% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RXI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.