RXI vs VOO
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RXI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $249M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 151 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -0.98% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.33% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.77% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.67% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RXI vs VOO Performance
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RXI returned +4.33% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, RXI is down 0.98% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, RXI compounded at +10.77% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.67% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RXI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for RXI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RXI charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RXI currently yields 1.47% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RXI and VOO share 47 holdings out of 590 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RXI or VOO?
RXI has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RXI or VOO?
Over the past year RXI returned +4.33% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RXI annualized +7.45% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RXI or VOO?
RXI has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RXI -62.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RXI and VOO?
RXI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RXI and VOO?
RXI and VOO share 47 common holdings with a 9.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 590 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RXI or VOO?
RXI yields 1.47% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RXI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.