SAWG vs VOO
AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SAWG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. SAWG is less concentrated, with 28.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAWG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 45 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +9.08% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.18% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 12.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.7%Tie | -18.7%Tie |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $12,747 | $14,199Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.4%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.1 years).
SAWG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
SAWG vs VOO Performance
AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) is an ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SAWG returned +12.18% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, SAWG is up 9.08% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 12.0% for SAWG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.7% for SAWG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SAWG charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SAWG currently yields 0.25% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
69.8% of SAWG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 90.7% of VOO's money is in holdings SAWG also owns.
Most of VOO is already inside SAWG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, SAWG as of Aug 17, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
382 positions in common, counted across the 1,155 positions we hold weights for in SAWG and 505 in VOO, against full books of 45 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 116 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SAWG (8.9% of the fund), and 82 for SAWG that do not appear in VOO (3.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SAWG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 6.07% | 7.51% | 1.44% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.24% | 6.59% | 1.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 3.96% | 4.30% | 0.34% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.96% | 3.62% | 0.66% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 2.34% | 3.25% | 0.91% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.06% | 2.77% | 0.71% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.85% | 2.59% | 0.74% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.46% | 1.92% | 0.46% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.33% | 2.02% | 0.69% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.11% | 1.84% | 0.73% |
90.7% of VOO is already inside SAWG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SAWG or VOO?
SAWG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SAWG or VOO?
Over the past year SAWG returned +12.18% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SAWG annualized +12.25% vs +18.17% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SAWG or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 12.0% for SAWG. Worst drawdown: SAWG -18.7% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both SAWG and VOO?
SAWG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SAWG and VOO?
90.7% of VOO's money is in holdings SAWG also owns. 90.7% of VOO's is in holdings SAWG also owns. They hold 382 positions in common, counted across the 1,155 positions we hold weights for in SAWG and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SAWG or VOO?
SAWG yields 0.25% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SAWG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. SAWG is less concentrated, with 28.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.