SBIO vs SPGM

Quick Verdict

SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2846 holdings.

Lower Fees: SPGMHigher Returns: SBIOMore Diversified: SPGM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSBIOSPGMWinner
Expense Ratio0.50%0.09%
AUM$202M$1.7B
Dividend Yield4.05%1.80%
Holdings872,985
YTD Return+34.80%+14.76%
1Y Return+106.24%+27.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+32.77%+20.87%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.56%+11.68%
Volatility (annualized)29.6%13.6%
Max Drawdown-63.1%-34.0%
Fund FamilyALPS AdvisorsSPDR State Street Global Advisors
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 30, 2014Feb 27, 2012

SBIO vs SPGM Performance

ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year SBIO returned +106.24% while SPGM returned +27.05%. Year to date, SBIO is up 34.80% versus a gain of 14.76% for SPGM.

Over three years, SBIO compounded at +32.77% per year against +20.87% for SPGM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.56% and +11.68% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, SPGM has the edge at +9.92% annualized vs +9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SBIO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 13.6% for SPGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.1% for SBIO and -34.0% for SPGM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SBIO charges 0.50% per year while SPGM charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $9 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SBIO currently yields 4.05% against 1.80% for SPGM.

Holdings Overlap

0.1%overlap

SBIO and SPGM share 21 holdings out of 2930 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SBIOWeight in SPGMDifference
APGE4.47%0.00%4.47%
TVTX2.87%0.00%2.87%
DFTX:CA2.53%0.01%2.52%
DYNProProPro
RLAYProProPro
IDYAProProPro
CLDXProProPro
VERAProProPro
IMNMProProPro
BCRXProProPro
See all 10 holdings SBIO shares with SPGM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SBIO or SPGM?

SBIO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.

Which performed better, SBIO or SPGM?

Over the past year SBIO returned +106.24% vs +27.05% for SPGM, so SBIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SBIO annualized +9.80% vs +9.92% for SPGM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, SBIO or SPGM?

SBIO has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SPGM. Worst drawdown: SBIO -63.1% vs SPGM -34.0%.

Should I hold both SBIO and SPGM?

SBIO and SPGM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between SBIO and SPGM?

SBIO and SPGM share 21 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2930 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, SBIO or SPGM?

SBIO yields 4.05% while SPGM yields 1.80%, so SBIO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →