SCHD vs USXF
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF
Which is better, SCHD or USXF?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, USXF over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. USXF is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | USXF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.10% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 0.81% |
| Holdings | 103 | 294 |
| YTD Return | +23.68%Best | +19.62% |
| 1Y Return | +28.36%Best | +21.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.20% | +27.03%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.07% | +14.51%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9%Best | -29.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,156 | $19,689Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 37.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jun 16, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 18, 2020 to Sep 22, 2026 (6.3 years).
SCHD vs USXF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.3 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs USXF Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +28.36% while USXF returned +21.57%. Year to date, SCHD is up 23.68% versus a gain of 19.62% for USXF.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.20% per year against +27.03% for USXF; over five years the annualized figures are +10.07% and +14.51% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, USXF has the edge at +18.49% annualized vs +14.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.2% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for SCHD and -29.5% for USXF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while USXF charges 0.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $10 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.81% for USXF.
Holdings Overlap
35.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings USXF also owns. 7.4% of USXF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
24 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 278 in USXF, against full books of 103 and 294.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 245 positions for USXF that do not appear in our book for SCHD (91.3% of the fund), and 75 for SCHD that do not appear in USXF (64.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHD | Weight in USXF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 3.88% | 1.29% | 2.59% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 3.97% | 0.83% | 3.14% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 3.13% | 0.94% | 2.19% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 3.33% | 0.54% | 2.79% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 2.84% | 0.46% | 2.38% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.79% | 0.45% | 2.34% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.52% | 0.71% | 1.81% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 2.31% | 0.38% | 1.93% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 1.38% | 0.22% | 1.16% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 1.19% | 0.19% | 1.00% |
35.7% of SCHD is already inside USXF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or USXF?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while USXF charges 0.10%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or USXF?
Over the past year SCHD returned +28.36% vs +21.57% for USXF, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), SCHD annualized +14.26% vs +18.49% for USXF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or USXF?
USXF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.2% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -16.9% vs USXF -29.5%.
Should I hold both SCHD and USXF?
SCHD and USXF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and USXF?
35.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings USXF also owns. 7.4% of USXF's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 278 in USXF.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or USXF?
SCHD yields 3.00% while USXF yields 0.81%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is USXF better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, USXF over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. USXF is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.