SCHD vs WAMA

SCHD vs WAMA

Which is better, SCHD or WAMA?

Large Cap Value against Allocation/Balanced.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. WAMA is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.

Lower Fees: SCHDLess Concentrated: WAMA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSCHDWAMA
Expense Ratio0.06%Best0.32%
AUM$112.1B$190M
Dividend Yield3.00%0.41%
Holdings1032
YTD Return+24.04%Best+8.20%
1Y Return+27.95%-
3Y Return (annualized)+15.51%-
5Y Return (annualized)+9.80%-
Top 10 Weight41.8%40.3%Best
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementWisdomTree Investments
CategoryEquityAllocation/Balanced
StyleLarge Cap ValueAllocation/Balanced
InceptionOct 20, 2011Mar 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SCHD vs WAMA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SCHD vs WAMA Performance

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund ETF (WAMA) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.04% versus a gain of 8.20% for WAMA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SCHD charges 0.06% per year while WAMA charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $32 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.41% for WAMA.

Holdings Overlap

SCHD already in WAMA87.7%
WAMA already in SCHD7.1%

87.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings WAMA also owns. 7.1% of WAMA's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.

Most of SCHD is already inside WAMA. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

42 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 504 in WAMA, against full books of 103 and 2.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 435 positions for WAMA that do not appear in our book for SCHD (90.0% of the fund), and 57 for SCHD that do not appear in WAMA (12.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SCHDWeight in WAMADifference
MRKMerck & Company Inc4.77%0.54%4.23%
AMGNAmgen Inc.4.70%0.34%4.36%
ABTAbbott Laboratories4.69%0.28%4.41%
KOCoca Cola Co.4.17%0.55%3.62%
CVXChevron Corp4.02%0.65%3.37%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated3.82%0.51%3.31%
HDHome Depot Inc/The3.88%0.44%3.44%
VZVerizon Communic3.97%0.30%3.67%
COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.013.94%0.25%3.69%
PEPPepsico Inc.3.64%0.28%3.36%

87.7% of SCHD is already inside WAMA.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SCHDWAMA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SCHD or WAMA?

SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while WAMA charges 0.32%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and WAMA?

87.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings WAMA also owns. 7.1% of WAMA's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 42 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 504 in WAMA.

Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or WAMA?

SCHD yields 3.00% while WAMA yields 0.41%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WAMA better than SCHD?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. WAMA is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.