SCHD vs XRLV
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | XRLV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.25% | |
| AUM | $108.7B | $29M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 2.08% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 102 | |
| YTD Return | +27.67% | +6.61% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.26% | +5.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.66% | +8.59% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.18% | +8.58% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 13.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -38.3% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Apr 6, 2015 |
SCHD vs XRLV Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +31.26% while XRLV returned +5.58%. Year to date, SCHD is up 27.67% versus a gain of 6.61% for XRLV.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.66% per year against +8.59% for XRLV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.18% and +8.58% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.57% annualized vs +9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 13.5% for XRLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -38.3% for XRLV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while XRLV charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $25 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 2.08% for XRLV.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and XRLV share 11 holdings out of 189 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or XRLV?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XRLV charges 0.25%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $19 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or XRLV?
Over the past year SCHD returned +31.26% vs +5.58% for XRLV, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), SCHD annualized +11.57% vs +9.89% for XRLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or XRLV?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 13.5% for XRLV. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs XRLV -38.3%.
Should I hold both SCHD and XRLV?
SCHD and XRLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and XRLV?
SCHD and XRLV share 11 common holdings with a 10.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 189 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or XRLV?
SCHD yields 3.13% while XRLV yields 2.08%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.