SCHV vs VTI
Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SCHV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SCHV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. SCHV is less concentrated, with 20.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15.6B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.77% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 560 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +14.83%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +19.26%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.61% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.98% | +12.36%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 14.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.1% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,835 | $17,908Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.4%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2009 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 11, 2009 to Sep 18, 2026 (16.8 years).
SCHV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.8 years both funds cover.
SCHV vs VTI Performance
Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCHV returned +19.26% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, SCHV is up 14.83% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, SCHV compounded at +17.61% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.98% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.53% annualized vs +9.47%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 14.1% for SCHV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.1% for SCHV and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHV charges 0.04% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHV currently yields 1.77% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.5% of SCHV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 42.6% of VTI's money is in holdings SCHV also owns.
Most of SCHV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
538 positions in common, counted across the 555 positions we hold weights for in SCHV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 560 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 628 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SCHV (55.1% of the fund), and 8 for SCHV that do not appear in VTI (0.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.41% | 1.29% | 2.12% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.01% | 1.31% | 1.70% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.91% | 1.28% | 1.63% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.10% | 0.89% | 1.21% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.02% | 0.86% | 1.16% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.45% | 0.68% | 0.77% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.43% | 0.61% | 0.82% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.38% | 0.57% | 0.81% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.39% | 0.50% | 0.89% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.27% | 0.55% | 0.72% |
98.5% of SCHV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHV or VTI?
SCHV has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHV or VTI?
Over the past year SCHV returned +19.26% vs +16.08% for VTI, so SCHV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), SCHV annualized +9.47% vs +12.53% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 14.1% for SCHV. Worst drawdown: SCHV -37.1% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SCHV and VTI?
SCHV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHV and VTI?
98.5% of SCHV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 42.6% of VTI's is in holdings SCHV also owns. They hold 538 positions in common, counted across the 555 positions we hold weights for in SCHV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHV or VTI?
SCHV yields 1.77% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SCHV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SCHV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SCHV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. SCHV is less concentrated, with 20.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.