SHRY vs VOO
First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SHRY or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SHRY | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.62% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 102 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +14.18%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +14.06% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.59% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.25% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,563 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 22, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (9.2 years).
SHRY vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
SHRY vs VOO Performance
First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SHRY returned +14.06% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, SHRY is up 14.18% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, SHRY compounded at +15.59% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.25% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.28% annualized vs +11.00%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SHRY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.9% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for SHRY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SHRY charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SHRY currently yields 1.62% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
98.3% of SHRY's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 22.2% of VOO's money is in holdings SHRY also owns.
Most of SHRY is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in SHRY and 505 in VOO, against full books of 102 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 448 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SHRY (77.3% of the fund), and 0 for SHRY that do not appear in VOO (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SHRY | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.87% | 6.59% | 5.72% |
| HPQHp Inc. | 5.93% | 0.03% | 5.90% |
| OMCOmnicom Group Inc. | 5.12% | 0.03% | 5.09% |
| FIFiserv, Inc. (United States) | 5.04% | 0.04% | 5.00% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 0.63% | 4.30% | 3.67% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 4.60% | 0.14% | 4.46% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 3.99% | 0.12% | 3.87% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 3.80% | 0.12% | 3.68% |
| AMPAmeriprise Financial Inc | 3.65% | 0.06% | 3.59% |
| STZConstellation Brands Inc Common Stock Usd 0.01 | 3.55% | 0.03% | 3.52% |
98.3% of SHRY is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SHRY or VOO?
SHRY has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SHRY or VOO?
Over the past year SHRY returned +14.06% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), SHRY annualized +11.00% vs +14.28% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SHRY or VOO?
SHRY has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.9% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SHRY -36.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SHRY and VOO?
SHRY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SHRY and VOO?
98.3% of SHRY's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 22.2% of VOO's is in holdings SHRY also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in SHRY and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SHRY or VOO?
SHRY yields 1.62% while VOO yields 1.08%, so SHRY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SHRY?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.