SLVP vs SPY
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SLVP delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVP | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $950M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +17.01% | +13.17% | |
| 1Y Return | +109.36% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +65.27% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.66% | +13.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2012 | Jan 22, 1993 |
SLVP vs SPY Performance
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year SLVP returned +109.36% while SPY returned +21.53%. Year to date, SLVP is up 17.01% versus a gain of 13.17% for SPY.
Over three years, SLVP compounded at +65.27% per year against +22.06% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +26.66% and +13.35% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.82% annualized vs +4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.6% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.6% for SLVP and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVP charges 0.39% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $9 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVP currently yields 2.28% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
SLVP and SPY share 1 holdings out of 539 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SLVP | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | 4.51% | 0.16% | 4.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVP or SPY?
SLVP has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLVP or SPY?
Over the past year SLVP returned +109.36% vs +21.53% for SPY, so SLVP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SLVP annualized +4.50% vs +8.82% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLVP or SPY?
SLVP has been the more volatile fund at 42.6% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SLVP -80.6% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both SLVP and SPY?
SLVP and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SLVP and SPY?
SLVP and SPY share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 539 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVP or SPY?
SLVP yields 2.28% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SLVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.