SPXN vs VOO
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SPXN or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SPXN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPXN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $80M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 397 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.73%Best | +12.50% |
| 1Y Return | +19.26%Best | +17.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.48%Best | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43%Best | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.1%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,778Best | $18,384 |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.9% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 22, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2015 to Sep 11, 2026 (11 years).
SPXN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11 years both funds cover.
SPXN vs VOO Performance
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPXN returned +19.26% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, SPXN is up 13.73% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Over three years, SPXN compounded at +21.48% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SPXN has the edge at +14.67% annualized vs +14.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPXN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.1% for SPXN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPXN charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPXN currently yields 0.91% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
98.1% of SPXN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 85.5% of VOO's money is in holdings SPXN also owns.
Most of SPXN is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
378 positions in common, counted across the 396 positions we hold weights for in SPXN and 505 in VOO, against full books of 397 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 120 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SPXN (14.1% of the fund), and 5 for SPXN that do not appear in VOO (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SPXN | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 9.25% | 7.51% | 1.74% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.96% | 6.59% | 1.37% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 6.31% | 4.30% | 2.01% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.65% | 3.62% | 1.03% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.70% | 3.25% | 0.45% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.45% | 2.77% | 0.68% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.96% | 2.59% | 0.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.25% | 1.92% | 0.33% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.75% | 2.02% | 0.27% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.58% | 1.84% | 0.26% |
98.1% of SPXN is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPXN or VOO?
SPXN has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SPXN or VOO?
Over the past year SPXN returned +19.26% vs +17.58% for VOO, so SPXN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), SPXN annualized +14.67% vs +14.21% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SPXN or VOO?
SPXN has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SPXN -32.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SPXN and VOO?
SPXN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SPXN and VOO?
98.1% of SPXN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 85.5% of VOO's is in holdings SPXN also owns. They hold 378 positions in common, counted across the 396 positions we hold weights for in SPXN and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPXN or VOO?
SPXN yields 0.91% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SPXN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SPXN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.