SPY vs STXF
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs Strive 500 ETF
Which is better, SPY or STXF?
Nearly the same fund. STXF costs less.
STXF has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, STXF over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. STXF is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | STXF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $804.7B | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.15% |
| Holdings | 505 | 512 |
| YTD Return | +10.96% | +11.16%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.52%Best | +15.49% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.73% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.53% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3%Best | 13.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.0% |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $20,550 | $20,695Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Strive Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Sep 15, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2022 to Sep 16, 2026 (4 years).
SPY vs STXF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
SPY vs STXF Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Strive 500 ETF (STXF) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management. Over the past year SPY returned +15.52% while STXF returned +15.49%. Year to date, SPY is up 10.96% versus a gain of 11.16% for STXF.
Over three years, SPY compounded at +20.73% per year against +20.98% for STXF. Across the full 4-year window we track, STXF has the edge at +19.94% annualized vs +19.73%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 13.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for SPY and -19.0% for STXF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while STXF charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $5 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.98% against 1.15% for STXF.
Holdings Overlap
97.8% of SPY's money is in holdings STXF also owns. 96.5% of STXF's money is in holdings SPY also owns.
Most of SPY is already inside STXF. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
430 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 506 in STXF, against full books of 505 and 512.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 58 positions for STXF that do not appear in our book for SPY (2.6% of the fund), and 70 for SPY that do not appear in STXF (1.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SPY | Weight in STXF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.01% | 7.81% | 0.20% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.26% | 6.92% | 0.34% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.66% | 5.69% | 0.03% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.79% | 3.81% | 0.02% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.99% | 2.97% | 0.02% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.66% | 2.61% | 0.05% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 2.37% | 0.02% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.93% | 1.90% | 0.03% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.52% | 1.86% | 0.34% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.62% | 0.02% |
97.8% of SPY is already inside STXF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or STXF?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while STXF charges 0.05%. STXF is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SPY or STXF?
Over the past year SPY returned +15.52% vs +15.49% for STXF, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SPY annualized +19.73% vs +19.94% for STXF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SPY or STXF?
STXF has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 13.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SPY -18.8% vs STXF -19.0%.
Should I hold both SPY and STXF?
SPY and STXF have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SPY and STXF?
97.8% of SPY's money is in holdings STXF also owns. 96.5% of STXF's is in holdings SPY also owns. They hold 430 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 506 in STXF.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or STXF?
SPY yields 0.98% while STXF yields 1.15%, so STXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is STXF better than SPY?
STXF has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, STXF over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. STXF is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.