STXV vs VYM
STRIVE 1000 VALUE ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, STXV or VYM?
Nearly the same fund. VYM costs less.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. STXV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. STXV is less concentrated, with 18.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | STXV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $81M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.01% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 712 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +16.09%Best | +11.71% |
| 1Y Return | +24.19%Best | +16.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.29%Best | +17.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 11.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $17,014Best | $16,175 |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.6%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2022 to Sep 16, 2026 (3.8 years).
STXV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
STXV vs VYM Performance
STRIVE 1000 VALUE ETF (STXV) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year STXV returned +24.19% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, STXV is up 16.09% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.
Over three years, STXV compounded at +18.29% per year against +17.24% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, STXV has the edge at +15.01% annualized vs +13.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STXV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 11.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for STXV and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
STXV charges 0.18% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $4 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, STXV currently yields 2.01% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
76.5% of STXV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 82.2% of VYM's money is in holdings STXV also owns.
Most of VYM is already inside STXV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
368 positions in common, counted across the 704 positions we hold weights for in STXV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 712 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 166 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for STXV (15.2% of the fund), and 288 for STXV that do not appear in VYM (22.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in STXV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 3.47% | 2.63% | 0.84% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.64% | 3.82% | 3.18% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.80% | 2.51% | 0.71% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.24% | 1.66% | 0.58% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.13% | 1.48% | 0.65% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.95% | 1.52% | 0.43% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.51% | 1.80% | 0.29% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.99% | 1.86% | 0.87% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.40% | 1.31% | 0.09% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 1.41% | 1.13% | 0.28% |
82.2% of VYM is already inside STXV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, STXV or VYM?
STXV has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, STXV or VYM?
Over the past year STXV returned +24.19% vs +16.24% for VYM, so STXV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), STXV annualized +15.01% vs +13.49% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, STXV or VYM?
STXV has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 11.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: STXV -14.8% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both STXV and VYM?
STXV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between STXV and VYM?
82.2% of VYM's money is in holdings STXV also owns. 82.2% of VYM's is in holdings STXV also owns. They hold 368 positions in common, counted across the 704 positions we hold weights for in STXV and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, STXV or VYM?
STXV yields 2.01% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than STXV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. STXV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. STXV is less concentrated, with 18.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.