SUSA vs VOO
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SUSA or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SUSA led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. SUSA is less concentrated, with 33.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SUSA | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.1B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.82% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 198 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.34% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.70%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.02% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.36% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.9%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,370 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.1%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2005 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 10, 2026 (16 years).
SUSA vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
SUSA vs VOO Performance
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF (SUSA) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SUSA returned +17.70% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, SUSA is up 11.34% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, SUSA compounded at +19.02% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.36% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +12.81%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUSA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.9% for SUSA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SUSA charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SUSA currently yields 0.82% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
95.1% of SUSA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 62.3% of VOO's money is in holdings SUSA also owns.
Most of SUSA is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
172 positions in common, counted across the 193 positions we hold weights for in SUSA and 505 in VOO, against full books of 198 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 324 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SUSA (37.2% of the fund), and 15 for SUSA that do not appear in VOO (3.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SUSA | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.82% | 7.51% | 0.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.54% | 6.59% | 0.05% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.39% | 4.30% | 0.09% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.36% | 2.59% | 0.77% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 2.57% | 3.25% | 0.68% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.86% | 2.77% | 0.09% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.46% | 2.02% | 0.56% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.36% | 1.84% | 0.48% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.40% | 1.47% | 0.07% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.32% | 1.47% | 0.15% |
95.1% of SUSA is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SUSA or VOO?
SUSA has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SUSA or VOO?
Over the past year SUSA returned +17.70% vs +17.54% for VOO, so SUSA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SUSA annualized +12.81% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SUSA or VOO?
SUSA has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SUSA -32.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SUSA and VOO?
SUSA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SUSA and VOO?
95.1% of SUSA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 62.3% of VOO's is in holdings SUSA also owns. They hold 172 positions in common, counted across the 193 positions we hold weights for in SUSA and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SUSA or VOO?
SUSA yields 0.82% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SUSA?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SUSA led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. SUSA is less concentrated, with 33.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.