TBG vs VYM
TBG Dividend Focus ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, TBG or VYM?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TBG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $282M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.53% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 39 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +14.11%Best | +13.15% |
| 1Y Return | +16.33% | +17.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $16,085 | $16,837Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.6% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | EA Series Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2023 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.8 years).
TBG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
TBG vs VYM Performance
TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) is an ETF from EA Series Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TBG returned +16.33% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, TBG is up 14.11% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TBG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.7% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for TBG and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TBG charges 0.45% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $4 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TBG currently yields 2.53% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
75.0% of TBG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 25.2% of VYM's money is in holdings TBG also owns.
Most of TBG is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
29 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in TBG and 603 in VYM, against full books of 39 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 539 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for TBG (72.3% of the fund), and 7 for TBG that do not appear in VYM (20.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TBG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 3.20% | 2.54% | 0.66% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 2.11% | 3.38% | 1.27% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 4.16% | 1.32% | 2.84% |
| BXBlackstone Group Inc/the Common Stock | 4.70% | 0.36% | 4.34% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 3.57% | 1.42% | 2.15% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 3.53% | 1.28% | 2.25% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 3.77% | 0.74% | 3.03% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 2.59% | 1.56% | 1.03% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.77% | 2.36% | 0.59% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.25% | 0.77% | 2.48% |
75.0% of TBG is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TBG or VYM?
TBG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TBG or VYM?
Over the past year TBG returned +16.33% vs +17.82% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TBG or VYM?
TBG has been the more volatile fund at 11.7% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: TBG -14.8% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both TBG and VYM?
TBG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TBG and VYM?
75.0% of TBG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 25.2% of VYM's is in holdings TBG also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in TBG and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, TBG or VYM?
TBG yields 2.53% while VYM yields 2.22%, so TBG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than TBG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.