URTH vs VTI
iShares MSCI World ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, URTH or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. URTH led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | URTH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.24% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8.2B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.36% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1,310 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +11.12% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.47%Best | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.58% | +20.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.02% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0%Best | 14.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,866 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 12, 2012 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.7 years).
URTH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.7 years both funds cover.
URTH vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year URTH returned +17.47% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, URTH is up 11.12% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, URTH compounded at +19.58% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.02% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +10.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 14.0% for URTH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for URTH and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
URTH charges 0.24% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $24 vs $3 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, URTH currently yields 1.36% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1,053 holdings in URTH and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 94.3% and 90.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 441 positions appear in both.
441 positions in common, counted across the 1,053 positions we hold weights for in URTH and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 1,310 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in URTH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.01% | 6.32% | 1.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.10% | 5.84% | 0.74% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 3.03% | 3.81% | 0.78% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.62% | 3.17% | 0.55% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 2.37% | 2.88% | 0.51% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.87% | 2.46% | 0.59% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.87% | 2.27% | 0.40% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.79% | 0.56% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.31% | 1.63% | 0.32% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.07% | 1.40% | 0.33% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of URTH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, URTH or VTI?
URTH has an expense ratio of 0.24% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, URTH or VTI?
Over the past year URTH returned +17.47% vs +17.34% for VTI, so URTH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), URTH annualized +10.68% vs +13.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, URTH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 14.0% for URTH. Worst drawdown: URTH -34.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both URTH and VTI?
URTH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, URTH or VTI?
URTH yields 1.36% while VTI yields 1.03%, so URTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than URTH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. URTH led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.