UTF vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUTFVTIWinner
Expense Ratio3.42%0.03%
AUM$3,053.86$663.5B
Dividend Yield6.75%1.07%
Holdings2973,543
YTD Return+16.12%+14.20%
1Y Return+8.19%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.35%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+6.56%+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)20.2%15.3%
Max Drawdown-76.7%-56.6%
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMar 30, 2004May 24, 2001

UTF vs VTI Performance

Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund Inc (UTF) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UTF returned +8.19% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, UTF is up 16.12% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, UTF compounded at +14.35% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.56% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UTF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.7% for UTF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UTF charges 3.42% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $342 vs $3 annually, a gap of $339 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UTF currently yields 6.75% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

2.0%overlap

UTF and VTI share 29 holdings out of 2996 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in UTFWeight in VTIDifference
NEE7.03%0.25%6.78%
NI4.23%0.03%4.20%
CSX3.29%0.12%3.17%
DUKProProPro
AMTProProPro
PPLProProPro
LNTProProPro
CCIProProPro
UNPProProPro
SOProProPro
See all 10 holdings UTF shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UTF or VTI?

UTF has an expense ratio of 3.42% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $339 per year of difference.

Which performed better, UTF or VTI?

Over the past year UTF returned +8.19% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), UTF annualized +3.26% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, UTF or VTI?

UTF has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UTF -76.7% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both UTF and VTI?

UTF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between UTF and VTI?

UTF and VTI share 29 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2996 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, UTF or VTI?

UTF yields 6.75% while VTI yields 1.07%, so UTF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →