VEGI vs VTI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, VEGI or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VEGI led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VEGI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $159M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.82% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 166 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +22.11%Best | +13.14% |
| 1Y Return | +21.84%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.70% | +22.30%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.89% | +12.01%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,313 | $17,631Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2012 to Sep 23, 2026 (14.6 years).
VEGI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.6 years both funds cover.
VEGI vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF (VEGI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VEGI returned +21.84% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, VEGI is up 22.11% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, VEGI compounded at +9.70% per year against +22.30% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.89% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.97% annualized vs +5.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VEGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 14.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for VEGI and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VEGI charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VEGI currently yields 1.82% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
59.1% of VEGI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.5% of VTI's money is in holdings VEGI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 124 positions we hold weights for in VEGI and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 166 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,138 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for VEGI (97.0% of the fund), and 3 for VEGI that do not appear in VTI (0.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VEGI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 24.32% | 0.21% | 24.11% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 10.12% | 0.07% | 10.05% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 7.00% | 0.05% | 6.95% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 3.57% | 0.03% | 3.54% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 2.62% | 0.02% | 2.60% |
| DARDarling Ingredients, Inc. | 1.88% | 0.01% | 1.87% |
| TTCToro Co/the | 1.77% | 0.01% | 1.76% |
| AGCOAGCO Corporation | 1.37% | 0.01% | 1.36% |
| MOSMosaic Co | 1.37% | 0.01% | 1.36% |
| LWLambwestonholdings Inc. | 1.28% | 0.01% | 1.27% |
59.1% of VEGI is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VEGI or VTI?
VEGI has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VEGI or VTI?
Over the past year VEGI returned +21.84% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VEGI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), VEGI annualized +5.09% vs +12.97% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VEGI or VTI?
VEGI has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 14.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VEGI -39.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both VEGI and VTI?
VEGI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VEGI and VTI?
59.1% of VEGI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.5% of VTI's is in holdings VEGI also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 124 positions we hold weights for in VEGI and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, VEGI or VTI?
VEGI yields 1.82% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VEGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than VEGI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VEGI led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.