VERS vs VXUS
VERS vs VXUS
ProShares Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VERS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VERS | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $6M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +17.50% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.76% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.78% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 15, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
VERS vs VXUS Performance
ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VERS returned +35.76% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, VERS is up 17.50% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, VERS compounded at +23.78% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VERS has the edge at +13.43% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VERS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.1% for VERS and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VERS charges 0.58% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $5 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VERS currently yields 0.12% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
VERS and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7901 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VERS or VXUS?
VERS has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VERS or VXUS?
Over the past year VERS returned +35.76% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VERS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), VERS annualized +13.43% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VERS or VXUS?
VERS has been the more volatile fund at 31.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: VERS -42.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both VERS and VXUS?
VERS and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VERS and VXUS?
VERS and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7901 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VERS or VXUS?
VERS yields 0.12% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.