VERS vs VTI
ProShares Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VERS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VERS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.50% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.76% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.78% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 15, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
VERS vs VTI Performance
ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VERS returned +35.76% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, VERS is up 17.50% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, VERS compounded at +23.78% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VERS has the edge at +13.43% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VERS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.1% for VERS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VERS charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VERS currently yields 0.12% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
VERS and VTI share 31 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VERS or VTI?
VERS has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VERS or VTI?
Over the past year VERS returned +35.76% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VERS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), VERS annualized +13.43% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VERS or VTI?
VERS has been the more volatile fund at 31.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VERS -42.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both VERS and VTI?
VERS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VERS and VTI?
VERS and VTI share 31 common holdings with a 23.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VERS or VTI?
VERS yields 0.12% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.