IVV vs VERS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Metaverse ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. VERS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $6M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.12% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 41 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +15.76% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +33.72% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +25.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 31.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -42.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 15, 2022 |
IVV vs VERS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while VERS returned +33.72%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 15.76% for VERS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +25.03% for VERS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VERS has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VERS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -42.1% for VERS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VERS charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.12% for VERS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and VERS share 14 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VERS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VERS charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or VERS?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +33.72% for VERS, so VERS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +13.02% for VERS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or VERS?
VERS has been the more volatile fund at 31.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VERS -42.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and VERS?
IVV and VERS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VERS?
IVV and VERS share 14 common holdings with a 25.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VERS?
IVV yields 1.09% while VERS yields 0.12%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.