IVV vs VERS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Metaverse ETF
Which is better, IVV or VERS?
Large Cap Blend against Single Currency.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, VERS over 1Y and 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VERS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.58% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.14% |
| Holdings | 508 | 41 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +13.01% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08% | +22.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29% | +23.57%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8%Best | 30.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1%Best | -42.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $18,697Best | $16,794 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 44.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Single Currency |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 15, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 17, 2022 to Sep 4, 2026 (4.5 years).
IVV vs VERS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs VERS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while VERS returned +22.94%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 13.01% for VERS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +23.57% for VERS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VERS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.8% compared with 15.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVV and -42.1% for VERS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VERS charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.14% for VERS.
Holdings Overlap
31.7% of IVV's money is in holdings VERS also owns. 41.9% of VERS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 39 in VERS, against full books of 508 and 41.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for VERS that do not appear in our book for IVV (53.8% of the fund), and 484 for IVV that do not appear in VERS (67.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in VERS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 5.20% | 2.78% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 4.65% | 2.21% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 5.11% | 0.33% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 5.19% | 1.18% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 3.19% | 4.65% | 1.46% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.94% | 4.67% | 2.73% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 2.61% | 1.10% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.30% | 3.34% | 3.04% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.25% | 2.26% | 2.01% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 0.06% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
41.9% of VERS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VERS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VERS charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or VERS?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +22.94% for VERS, so VERS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or VERS?
VERS has been the more volatile fund at 30.8% annualized versus 15.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -22.1% vs VERS -42.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and VERS?
IVV and VERS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VERS?
41.9% of VERS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 41.9% of VERS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 39 in VERS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VERS?
IVV yields 1.10% while VERS yields 0.14%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VERS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, VERS over 1Y and 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.