QQQ vs VERS
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs ProShares Metaverse ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. VERS delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | VERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $6M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 0.12% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 41 | |
| YTD Return | +17.85% | +15.76% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.45% | +33.72% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.07% | +25.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.16% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 31.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -42.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 15, 2022 |
QQQ vs VERS Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.45% while VERS returned +33.72%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.85% versus a gain of 15.76% for VERS.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.07% per year against +25.03% for VERS. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.09% annualized vs +13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VERS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.2% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -42.1% for VERS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while VERS charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $58 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 0.12% for VERS.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and VERS share 12 holdings out of 131 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or VERS?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VERS charges 0.58%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or VERS?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.45% vs +33.72% for VERS, so VERS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +13.09% vs +13.02% for VERS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or VERS?
VERS has been the more volatile fund at 31.2% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs VERS -42.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and VERS?
QQQ and VERS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and VERS?
QQQ and VERS share 12 common holdings with a 29.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 131 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or VERS?
QQQ yields 0.41% while VERS yields 0.12%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.